Lenovo ThinkPad P73 Review – Mobile Workstation with Core i9, RTX 4000 and 4K

0
79
Lenovo ThinkPad P73 Review – Mobile Workstation with Core i9, RTX 4000 and 4K

Full performance after BIOS updates. The ThinkPad P73 has been around for a while, but Lenovo had to deliver some BIOS updates before the device could use the full potential of its components. Neither Intel, nor Nvidia, introduced major updates in the last 18 months, so the P73 is still up to date in the beginning of 2021.

The ThinkPad P73 is Lenovo’s biggest mobile workstation, but it struggled with the performance. Especially the powerful Nvidia Quadro RTX GPUs did not utilize their full potential. Lenovo had to launch some BIOS updates to improve the situation. Lenovo has already launched the successor ThinkPad P17 by now, bit the components are still pretty much the same. You now get Intel 10th generation chips, which do not offer any noticeable performance gains, and even the identical Nvidia Quadro GPUs. With the P73 equipped with a Core i9 and the RTX 4000, we once again want to check whether the performance now meets the expectations. Please see our comprehensive review of the ThinkPad P73 with the RTX 3000 for more information on the case, ports, input devices, and the speakers:

Processor

Intel Core i9-9880H 8 x 2.3 – 4.8 GHz, 107 W PL2 / Short Burst, 70 W PL1 / Sustained, Coffee Lake-H

Memory

32768 MB 

, DDR4-2666, Dual-Channel, up to 128 GB, 2/4 slots free

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, B173ZAN01.0, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz

Soundcard

Intel Cannon Lake-H/S – cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: SD, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.0

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 31 x 416 x 281 ( = 1.22 x 16.38 x 11.06 in)

Battery

99 Wh Lithium-Ion, Battery runtime (according to manufacturer): 10 h

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD 720p

Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 230W PSU, 36 Months Warranty

Weight

3.491 kg ( = 123.14 oz / 7.7 pounds), Power Supply: 886 g ( = 31.25 oz / 1.95 pounds)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

428 mm / 16.9 inch 303.3 mm / 11.9 inch 26.5 mm / 1.043 inch 4.5 kg9.92 lbs416 mm / 16.4 inch 281 mm / 11.1 inch 31 mm / 1.22 inch 3.5 kg7.7 lbs416 mm / 16.4 inch 281 mm / 11.1 inch 31 mm / 1.22 inch 3.5 kg7.62 lbs397 mm / 15.6 inch 268.5 mm / 10.6 inch 27.5 mm / 1.083 inch 2.6 kg5.73 lbs382 mm / 15 inch 286 mm / 11.3 inch 18.4 mm / 0.724 inch 2.5 kg5.47 lbs

05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip

; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1489 (1399-1630)

; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1509 (1412-1561)

ColorChecker

4.3 ∆E

12.1 ∆E

6.5 ∆E

3.4 ∆E

10.8 ∆E

11.1 ∆E

9.1 ∆E

5.5 ∆E

19.1 ∆E

5.8 ∆E

8.9 ∆E

12.4 ∆E

7.3 ∆E

6.8 ∆E

16.5 ∆E

4.3 ∆E

14.5 ∆E

8.6 ∆E

3.9 ∆E

6 ∆E

5.2 ∆E

5 ∆E

9.7 ∆E

13 ∆E

ColorChecker Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE: 8.74 ∆E min: 3.44 – max: 19.12 ∆E

Our test unit is equipped with the matte 4K panel. We cannot confirm the advertised brightness of 400 nits at any measuring spot. Lenovo still uses 16:9 panels for the successor ThinkPad P17, but the brightness of the 4K screen is now rated at around 500 nits.

The subjective picture impression is decent, but not great. Bright surfaces look a bit grainy and the contrast ratio is lower than 1000:1 due to the high black value (0.38 cd/m²). This panel from AU Optronics (B173ZAN01.0) does not use PWM. Our test unit suffers from clearly visible backlight bleeding, especially at the lower edge, which is also noticeable on dark surfaces in everyday scenarios.

334

cd/m²
352

cd/m²
336

cd/m²
358

cd/m²
366

cd/m²
359

cd/m²
361

cd/m²
322

cd/m²
357

cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

B173ZAN01.0

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 366 cd/m² Average: 349.4 cd/m² Minimum: 3.9 cd/m²

Brightness Distribution: 88 %

Center on Battery: 363 cd/m²

Contrast: 963:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)

ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.6-29.43 Ø5.7, calibrated: 1.1

ΔE Greyscale 5.5 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9

100% sRGB (Argyll 3D) 86% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)

Gamma: 2.47

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

B173ZAN01.0, IPS, 3840×2160, 17.30
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro

AU Optronics B173ZAN03.1, IPS, 3840×2160, 17.30
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T

170PUW1-A00, IPS, 1920×1200, 17.00
MSI WE75 9TK

AU Optronics B173HAN04.2, IPS, 1920×1080, 17.30
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE

N173HCE-E31, IPS LED, 1920×1080, 17.30
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *

44 (22, 22)

53 (27, 26)

-20%

41.2 (22, 19.2)

6%

30.8 (14.4, 16.4)

30%

40 (20.4, 19.6)

9%

Response Time Black / White *

26.4 (14, 12.4)

37 (21, 16)

-40%

29.6 (16.4, 13.2)

-12%

31.2 (18.8, 12.4)

-18%

28 (17.2, 10.8)

-6%

PWM Frequency

25000 (50)

Brightness middle

366

377

3%

323

-12%

287.3

-22%

333

-9%

Brightness

349

368

5%

308

-12%

280

-20%

310

-11%

Brightness Distribution

88

83

-6%

88

0%

89

1%

83

-6%

Black Level *

0.38

0.37

3%

0.36

5%

0.26

32%

0.39

-3%

Contrast

963

1019

6%

897

-7%

1105

15%

854

-11%

Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *

4.3

2.52

41%

1.1

74%

2.98

31%

4.4

-2%

Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *

7.1

5.55

22%

3.3

54%

5.08

28%

7.5

-6%

Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *

1.1

1.08

2%

0.8

27%

3.06

-178%

2

-82%

Greyscale DeltaE2000 *

5.5

3.83

30%

0.8

85%

3

45%

5.1

7%

Gamma

2.47 89%

2.19 100%

2.23 99%

2.28 96%

2.39 92%

CCT

6281 103%

6323 103%

6479 100%

6993 93%

7061 92%

Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)

86

84

-2%

75.7

-12%

58.1

-32%

61.1

-29%

Color Space (Percent of sRGB)

100

98

-2%

99.8

0%

89.5

-10%

94

-6%

* … smaller is better

We use the professional CalMAN software in combination with the X-Rite i1 Pro 2 spectrophotometer for the display analysis. The factory calibration is not great, because both the grayscale as well as the colors show significant deviations from the AdobeRGB reference. The grayscale also shows a slight color cast towards red. Contrary to the recently reviewed ThinkPad P15s with the 4K screen, the P73 does not support pre-installed color profiles to switch the between color spaces.

The situation is much better after our calibration (the profile can be downloaded for free in the box above), and both the grayscale as well as the color deviations are below the important mark of 3. The wide AdobeRGB color gamut is almost covered completely (88 %), which means the calibrated panel is suited for picture/video editing.

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

       Response Time Black to White
26.4 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 14 ms rise

↘ 12.4 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.

In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better.

This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (24.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
44 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 22 ms rise

↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.

In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better.

This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (38.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9732 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 142900) Hz was measured.

You can only use the P73 comfortable outdoors when you can avoid reflections from light sources and brighter environments. The large panel is matte, but it could have been much brighter. The viewing angle stability of the IPS panel is good.

The Core i9-9880H (Coffee Lake-H) has 8 cores (16 threads) and can reach up to 4.8 GHz (1 or 2 cores) or up to 4.1 GHz on all eight cores, respectively. As expected for a large mobile workstation, Lenovo implements generous TDP limitations at 70/107 Watts. 

We can still not see the maximum clock of 4.1 GHz on all cores in the benchmarks, but “only” 8x 3.8 GHz (102 W) and then 8x 3.1 GHz under sustained workloads. This value can be maintained and the overall performance in the comparison group is good, even though current mobile workstations still waive AMD’s CPU options.

The TDP limitations are a bit lower on battery power (51/60 W), so the performance drops by around 20 %.

0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600Tooltip

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1508 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

234 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

192 Points

Help

The ThinkPad P73 is only beaten by the Acer ConceptD 9 Pro with the more powerful Quadro RTX 5000 GPU in some categories of the synthetic PCMark, but all other comparison devices are beaten. Our subjective performance impression supports the results, because the mobile workstation is just a very powerful and responsive device in practice.

Acer ConceptD 9 Pro

Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00


10441 Points ∼100% +15%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H, samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR


9113 Points ∼87%

Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)

 





9113 Points ∼87% 0%

MSI WE75 9TK

Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ


7156 Points ∼69% -21%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE

Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L


6876 Points ∼66% -25%

Average of class Workstation

  (2329 – 10441, n=62)





5255 Points ∼50% -42%

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T

Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR


4511 Points ∼43% -50%

Acer ConceptD 9 Pro

Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00


8761 Points ∼100% +9%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H, samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR


8071 Points ∼92%

Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)

 





8071 Points ∼92% 0%

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T

Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR


7769 Points ∼89% -4%

MSI WE75 9TK

Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ


7693 Points ∼88% -5%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE

Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L


7641 Points ∼87% -5%

Average of class Workstation

  (3998 – 8877, n=62)





7219 Points ∼82% -11%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H, samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR


10093 Points ∼100%

Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)

 





10093 Points ∼100% 0%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE

Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L


9917 Points ∼98% -2%

Acer ConceptD 9 Pro

Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00


9915 Points ∼98% -2%

MSI WE75 9TK

Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ


9694 Points ∼96% -4%

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T

Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR


9214 Points ∼91% -9%

Average of class Workstation

  (5223 – 10829, n=62)





8829 Points ∼87% -13%

Acer ConceptD 9 Pro

Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00


6939 Points ∼100% +7%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H, samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR


6491 Points ∼94%

Average Intel Core i9-9880H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)

 





6491 Points ∼94% 0%

MSI WE75 9TK

Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ


5815 Points ∼84% -10%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE

Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L


5768 Points ∼83% -11%

Average of class Workstation

  (2817 – 6939, n=63)





4930 Points ∼71% -24%

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T

Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR


4918 Points ∼71% -24%

PCMark 10 Score 6491 points

Help

Two slots for M.2-PCIe-SSDs
Two slots for M.2-PCIe-SSDs

The ThinkPad P73 offers two slots for M.2-2282 SSDs with fast PCIe-x4-3.0 interface. Our test unit is equipped with a single PM981a drive from samsung with a storage capacity of 1 TB, and you can use 900 GB after the initial setup. The performance of the NVMe SSD is very good in all tests.

The chassis has space for an additional 2.5-inch drive, but the required cables and assembly tools are not provided.

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro

WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T

samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
MSI WE75 9TK

samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE

Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR

 
Write 4K

150.11

176

17%

147.57

-2%

135.4

-10%

154.3

3%

143 (101 – 212, n=17)

-5%

Read 4K

48.48

48.06

-1%

47.57

-2%

56.64

17%

66.36

37%

48.2 (41.9 – 57.2, n=17)

-1%

Write Seq

1414.01

2736

93%

2221.97

57%

1972

39%

1561

10%

1992 (1067 – 2938, n=16)

41%

Read Seq

1261.71

2381

89%

2543.41

102%

2101

67%

2460

95%

1875 (973 – 2639, n=16)

49%

Write 4K Q32T1

430.71

418.6

-3%

459.23

7%

527.4

22%

438

2%

465 (268 – 656, n=17)

8%

Read 4K Q32T1

538.56

460.8

-14%

515.07

-4%

578

7%

567.8

5%

508 (348 – 723, n=17)

-6%

Write Seq Q32T1

2982.5

2791

-6%

2166.8

-27%

1985

-33%

1581

-47%

3003 (2936 – 3033, n=17)

1%

Read Seq Q32T1

3548.6

3430

-3%

3430

-3%

3358

-5%

2724

-23%

3463 (2853 – 3568, n=17)

-2%

Write 4K Q8T8

999.6

1491

Read 4K Q8T8

928

1499

Copy Game MB/s

1264.45

1334.74

6%

1506.07

19%

1374.7

9%

1048 (441 – 1433, n=10)

-17%

Copy Program MB/s

595.36

536.59

-10%

525.56

-12%

542.23

-9%

446 (123 – 595, n=10)

-25%

Copy ISO MB/s

2932.4

2212.3

-25%

2342.89

-20%

1715.52

-41%

2117 (1131 – 2932, n=10)

-28%

Score Total

5489

4739

-14%

5411

-1%

4594

-16%

3088

-44%

4792 (3309 – 5810, n=17)

-13%

Score Write

2332

1907

-18%

2130

-9%

2008

-14%

1309

-44%

2060 (1471 – 2332, n=17)

-12%

Score Read

2095

1892

-10%

2189

4%

1689

-19%

1203

-43%

1812 (1154 – 2339, n=17)

-14%

Access Time Write *

0.027

0.036

-33%

0.036

-33%

0.106

-293%

0.067

-148%

0.0377 (0.021 – 0.099, n=17)

-40%

Access Time Read *

0.055

0.061

-11%

0.103

-87%

0.058

-5%

0.0497 (0.032 – 0.087, n=17)

10%

4K-64 Write

1954.94

1540.11

-21%

1788.53

-9%

1714.96

-12%

1005.5

-49%

1712 (1074 – 2012, n=17)

-12%

4K-64 Read

1778.78

1570.15

-12%

1836.32

3%

1509.96

-15%

871.15

-51%

1513 (878 – 2011, n=17)

-15%

4K Write

139.44

103.22

-26%

106.1

-24%

106.55

-24%

149.48

7%

127 (88.2 – 164, n=17)

-9%

4K Read

53.54

22.54

-58%

56.57

6%

48.35

-10%

62.59

17%

53.2 (45.5 – 61.4, n=17)

-1%

Seq Write

2375

2639.63

11%

2350

-1%

1871.19

-21%

1541.94

-35%

2205 (1296 – 2837, n=17)

-7%

Seq Read

2627

2995.28

14%

2958

13%

1308.31

-50%

2693.38

3%

2459 (1950 – 2861, n=17)

-6%

* … smaller is better

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3548.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2982.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
538.56 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
430.71 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq:
1261.71 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq:
1414.01 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
48.48 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
150.11 MB/s

05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800185019001950200020502100215022002250230023502400245025002550260026502700275028002850290029503000305031003150320032503300335034003450Tooltip

: Ø3400 (3191.45-3416.98)

GPU-Z Nvidia Quadro RTX 4srcsrcsrc
GPU-Z Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000

Lenovo does not use the integrated graphics adapter of the processor. Instead, the dedicated Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 takes care of the graphics calculations all the time. The RTX 4000 has been around since-mid 2019, but it is still a high-end GPU.

A couple of BIOS updates were necessary, but the P73 can now utilize the full potential of the RTX 4000 and the results are also slightly better than the average values for other RTX 4000 devices in our database. As expected, the performance is pretty much right in the middle between the RTX 3000 and the RTX 5000, although there can be differences depending on the individual versions. This is not only the case for the 3DMark tests, but also professional scenarios that we test with SPECviewperf.

We also checked the performance under sustained workloads with the demanding 3DMark Time Spy stress test, and the P73 passed the test (98.3 %). The performance is, however, significantly lower on battery power, and you have to expect a deficit of ~70 %.

Acer ConceptD 9 Pro

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK


9956 Points ∼100% +29%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H


7717 Points ∼78%

Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)

  (6851 – 7717, n=2)





7284 Points ∼73% -6%

MSI WE75 9TK

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H


6014 Points ∼60% -22%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H


5503 Points ∼55% -29%

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H


4943 Points ∼50% -36%

Average of class Workstation

  (566 – 9956, n=53)





4033 Points ∼41% -48%

Acer ConceptD 9 Pro

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK


24354 Points ∼100% +21%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H


20079 Points ∼82%

Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)

  (17619 – 20079, n=2)





18849 Points ∼77% -6%

MSI WE75 9TK

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H


15881 Points ∼65% -21%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H


13802 Points ∼57% -31%

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H


13196 Points ∼54% -34%

Average of class Workstation

  (752 – 24354, n=125)





6877 Points ∼28% -66%

Acer ConceptD 9 Pro

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK


203.8 fps ∼100% +14%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H


178.89 fps ∼88%

Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)

  (125 – 179, n=2)





152 fps ∼75% -15%

MSI WE75 9TK

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H


122.09 fps ∼60% -32%

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H


110.83 fps ∼54% -38%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H


109.62 fps ∼54% -39%

Average of class Workstation

  (37.3 – 217, n=43)





109 fps ∼53% -39%

Acer ConceptD 9 Pro

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK


465.3 fps ∼100% +30%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H


357.07 fps ∼77%

Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)

  (271 – 357, n=2)





314 fps ∼67% -12%

MSI WE75 9TK

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H


225.36 fps ∼48% -37%

Average of class Workstation

  (36.4 – 465, n=42)





185 fps ∼40% -48%

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H


179.45 fps ∼39% -50%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H


160.56 fps ∼35% -55%

Acer ConceptD 9 Pro

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK


127.1 fps ∼100% +27%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H


100.28 fps ∼79%

Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)

  (94 – 100, n=2)





97.2 fps ∼76% -3%

MSI WE75 9TK

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H


80.91 fps ∼64% -19%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H


73.33 fps ∼58% -27%

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H


67.84 fps ∼53% -32%

Average of class Workstation

  (12.6 – 127, n=42)





55.9 fps ∼44% -44%

Acer ConceptD 9 Pro

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK


133.4 fps ∼100% +30%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H


102.54 fps ∼77%

Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)

  (73.2 – 103, n=2)





87.9 fps ∼66% -14%

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H


67.11 fps ∼50% -35%

MSI WE75 9TK

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H


65.56 fps ∼49% -36%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H


53.87 fps ∼40% -47%

Average of class Workstation

  (6.8 – 133, n=42)





48.7 fps ∼37% -53%

Acer ConceptD 9 Pro

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK


340.8 fps ∼100% +19%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H


286.1 fps ∼84%

Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)

  (208 – 286, n=2)





247 fps ∼72% -14%

MSI WE75 9TK

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H


194.67 fps ∼57% -32%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H


155.35 fps ∼46% -46%

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H


146.36 fps ∼43% -49%

Average of class Workstation

  (29.4 – 341, n=42)





138 fps ∼40% -52%

Acer ConceptD 9 Pro

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK


57.3 fps ∼100% +27%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H


45.02 fps ∼79%

Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)

  (36 – 45, n=2)





40.5 fps ∼71% -10%

MSI WE75 9TK

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H


30.55 fps ∼53% -32%

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H


25.94 fps ∼45% -42%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H


25.76 fps ∼45% -43%

Average of class Workstation

  (0.72 – 57.3, n=42)





19 fps ∼33% -58%

Acer ConceptD 9 Pro

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK


319.8 fps ∼100% +18%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H


269.9 fps ∼84%

Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)

  (208 – 270, n=2)





239 fps ∼75% -11%

MSI WE75 9TK

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H


196.19 fps ∼61% -27%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H


160.6 fps ∼50% -40%

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H


151.8 fps ∼47% -44%

Average of class Workstation

  (27.8 – 320, n=42)





138 fps ∼43% -49%

Acer ConceptD 9 Pro

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK


338.9 fps ∼100% +22%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H


277.28 fps ∼82%

Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)

  (213 – 277, n=2)





245 fps ∼72% -12%

MSI WE75 9TK

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H


205.21 fps ∼61% -26%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H


185.84 fps ∼55% -33%

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H


166.87 fps ∼49% -40%

Average of class Workstation

  (27.7 – 339, n=42)





152 fps ∼45% -45%

Acer ConceptD 9 Pro

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9980HK


232.2 fps ∼100% +26%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), Intel Core i9-9880H


184.29 fps ∼79%

Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)

  (173 – 184, n=2)





179 fps ∼77% -3%

MSI WE75 9TK

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9750H


162.5 fps ∼70% -12%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H


149.42 fps ∼64% -19%

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H


120.32 fps ∼52% -35%

Average of class Workstation

  (20 – 232, n=43)





109 fps ∼47% -41%

3DMark 11 Performance
23310 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
17894 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
7901 points

Help

The performance of the Quadro RTX 4000 is roughly comparable with a GeForce RTX 2070 or 2080 Max-Q. The Quadro drivers work really well with games for the last couple of years, only brand-new titles might show a warning message for the drivers (but the games usually still run). We did not experience any problems and the gaming performance is, as expected, very good. Many games can be played in the native 4K resolution and maximum details; only very demanding titles require a reduction of the resolution or the settings.

The fans stay pretty quiet under load at around 40 dB(A) when you consider the performance. The murmur of the fans is hardly annoying or high-pitched. In practice, you can notice the lack of the iGPU, because one of the fans often starts spinning when you stress the Nvidia GPU a bit, which would not be the case with an efficient iGPU.

The fans were quieter in general before the BIOS updates, but this obviously affected the performance. We did not notice any electronic sounds or coil whine during our review period.

Noise Level

Idle

29.5 / 29.5 / 30.2 dB(A)

Load
36.5 / 39.6 dB(A)
  red to green bar

 

30 dB

silent

40 dB(A)

audible

50 dB(A)

loud

 

min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM-1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 29.5 dB(A)

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), i9-9880H, samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro

Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), i9-9980HK, WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T

Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
MSI WE75 9TK

Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9750H, samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE

Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L
off / environment *

29.5

30.8

-4%

29.4

-0%

28.5

3%

29.3

1%

Idle Minimum *

29.5

31.6

-7%

29.4

-0%

29

2%

29.3

1%

Idle Average *

29.5

31.6

-7%

29.9

-1%

29

2%

29.3

1%

Idle Maximum *

30.2

31.9

-6%

29.9

1%

31.5

-4%

29.3

3%

Load Average *

36.5

41.2

-13%

31.6

13%

32

12%

30.2

17%

Witcher 3 ultra *

39.6

44.6

-13%

31.6

20%

44.7

-13%

30.7

22%

Load Maximum *

39.6

44.1

-11%

31.6

20%

56.5

-43%

33.1

16%

* … smaller is better

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.733.531.732.933.92528.728.526.129.529.53130.63329.632.532.64029.929.627.730.528.95028.828.12928.3256329.826.227.22625.98026.126.324.625.626.810027.627.527.726.528.112528.126.925.124.426.616029.627.22722.525.120027.126.124.42325.325028.126.223.923.425.631526.52421.719.623.44002925.720.518.92550028.926.41918.329.863026.624.321.117.224.580027.724.917.417.723.910002925.41817.524.3125029.126.517.617.124.9160029.525.316.715.924.3200030.825.616.716.225.9250027.72516.51624.3315027.825.916.616.524.9400026.623.717.116.823.1500024.121.817.417.121.2630021.52017.617.619.6800019.919.218.117.918.81000018.718.418.318.318.41250018.618.518.518.418.51600018.718.818.818.618.8SPL39.636.530.229.536.1N3.32.61.41.32.5median 27.7median 25.3median 18.3median 17.9median 24.3Delta2.92.22.61.91.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseLenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

Lenovo does a good job with the surface temperatures, because you could still put the device on your lap during the stress test (even though this is improbable due to the dimensions of the notebook). It is interesting that the top left corner on top of the base unit is quite a bit warmer at almost 50 °C, but the hotspot is located above the keyboard, so there are no limitations. The rear portion of the notebook also warms up noticeably while idling, which is once again caused by the lack of the iGPU.

Our stress test shows that the performance of the graphics cards is stable, even in combined workload scenarios. The CPU performance, however, is reduced, and the 70 W we saw during CPU load only cannot be maintained. A look at the following diagram shows the CPU consumption drops to around 42 W and 8x ~2.2 GHz after a few minutes. There are no performance limitations immediately after the stress test.

CPU & GPU data stress test
CPU & GPU data stress test
  49.2 °C

121 F
46.7 °C

116 F
41.8 °C

107 F
 
  42.3 °C

108 F
41.7 °C

107 F
37.6 °C

100 F
 
  29.8 °C

86 F
32.6 °C

91 F
29.2 °C

85 F
 
Maximum: 49.2 °C = 121 F

Average: 39 °C = 102 F
43.4 °C

110 F
41.4 °C

107 F
45.2 °C

113 F
35.2 °C

95 F
40.3 °C

105 F
40.4 °C

105 F
32.5 °C

91 F
34.9 °C

95 F
33.3 °C

92 F
Maximum: 45.2 °C = 113 F

Average: 38.5 °C = 101 F

Power Supply (max.)  40.6 °C = 105 F | Room Temperature 20.5 °C = 69 F | Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 31.5 °C / 89 F for the devices in the class Workstation.

(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 37.6 °C / 100 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.

(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.9 °C / 106 F

(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 31.5 °C / 89 F.

(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.6 °C / 90.7 F) and are therefore not hot.

(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-4.8 °C / -8.7 F).

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.932.72529.528.53132.530.14030.529.65028.327.3632629.18025.626.110026.526.612524.428.616022.530.92002344.725023.450.831519.655.740018.958.550018.359.863017.258.380017.759100017.564.9125017.165.1160015.962.5200016.260.625001660.2315016.559.1400016.856.8500017.154.5630017.651.5800017.947.21000018.344.21250018.444.21600018.642.8SPL29.572.1N1.327.9median 17.9median 55.7Delta1.97.832.932.232.931.532.631.532.232.232.231.630.131.630.529.930.528.227.828.227.926.127.927.625.927.628.723.728.738.324.238.338.322.938.346.821.846.857.621.857.662.120.462.157.719.857.761.519.361.559.718.759.764.518.764.566.417.966.466.818.166.869.918.269.966.11866.157.218.157.263.518.363.559.618.659.66318.76365.118.865.166.818.866.861.718.861.763.518.863.576.930.876.938.61.538.6median 61.7median 18.8median 61.77.51.77.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GEAcer ConceptD 9 Pro

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.1 dB)

Bass 100 – 315 Hz

(-) | nearly no bass – on average 16.2% lower than median

(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)

Mids 400 – 2000 Hz

(±) | higher mids – on average 5.4% higher than median

(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)

Highs 2 – 16 kHz

(+) | balanced highs – only 4.9% away from median

(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)

Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz

(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)

Compared to same class

» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 18% worse

» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 31%

Compared to all devices tested

» 63% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 29% worse

» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Acer ConceptD 9 Pro audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69.9 dB)

Bass 100 – 315 Hz

(-) | nearly no bass – on average 22.1% lower than median

(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)

Mids 400 – 2000 Hz

(+) | balanced mids – only 3.4% away from median

(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)

Highs 2 – 16 kHz

(+) | balanced highs – only 3.3% away from median

(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)

Overall 100 – 16.000 Hz

(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)

Compared to same class

» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 37% worse

» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 31%

Compared to all devices tested

» 37% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 56% worse

» The best had a delta of 3%, average was 21%, worst was 65%

Bulky 23srcW PSU
Bulky 230W PSU

We have already mentioned the deactivated iGPU of the processor. The constant utilization of the dedicated Quadro GPU in combination with the 4K panel increases the power consumption in idle scenarios noticeably. Depending on the brightness level, we can measure between 21-36 W, and therefore nearly twice as much as the previous review unit of the ThinkPad P73.

The maximum consumption is around 215 W, but this value will level off at around 170 W. This means the provided 230 W power adapter is completely sufficient. by the way, it is not possible to charge the device via USB-C.

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

i9-9880H, Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 3840×2160, 17.30
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro

i9-9980HK, Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), WDC PC SN720 SDAQNTW-1T00, IPS, 3840×2160, 17.30
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T

i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920×1200, 17.00
MSI WE75 9TK

i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920×1080, 17.30
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE

i7-9850H, Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920×1080, 17.30
Average NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)

 
Average of class Workstation

 
Idle Minimum *

21

18.8

10%

11.3

46%

12.1

42%

8.9

58%

18.7 (16.4 – 21, n=2)

11%

12.7 (2.4 – 65.2, n=153)

40%

Idle Average *

30.4

25

18%

16

47%

18.4

39%

12.8

58%

26 (21.6 – 30.4, n=2)

14%

18.6 (4.94 – 69, n=152)

39%

Idle Maximum *

35.8

30

16%

16.8

53%

18.8

47%

16.4

54%

29.4 (22.9 – 35.8, n=2)

18%

22.2 (7.1 – 73.1, n=153)

38%

Load Average *

110

116

-5%

93.6

15%

95.1

14%

108.4

1%

99 (88 – 110, n=2)

10%

89.3 (34.4 – 185, n=151)

19%

Witcher 3 ultra *

182

221

-21%

106

42%

135.5

26%

153

16%

Load Maximum *

215.4

241

-12%

186.6

13%

203.7

5%

166

23%

204 (193 – 215, n=2)

5%

135 (43.5 – 336, n=151)

37%

* … smaller is better

Lenovo integrates a large 99 Wh battery, but the runtimes are still pretty short due to the high power consumption. It is obviously questionable how often you will really use such a big device like the P73 without a power a adapter. You can expect between 3-4 hours in practice depending on the brightness, which should be sufficient for the many of meetings. If you really stress the device, the battery will last little more than 70 minutes.

Battery Runtime

NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
3h 56min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 max Brightness
2h 59min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
4h 05min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 14min
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE

i9-9880H, Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop), 99 Wh
Acer ConceptD 9 Pro

i9-9980HK, Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop), 71.9 Wh
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T

i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, 57 Wh
MSI WE75 9TK

i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), 65 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE

i7-9850H, Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), 99 Wh
Average of class Workstation

 
H.264

245

212

-13%

412

68%

585

139%

428 (123 – 1131, n=74)

75%

WiFi v1.3

236

218

-8%

352

49%

293

24%

664

181%

429 (106 – 974, n=93)

82%

Load

74

53

-28%

99

34%

61

-18%

85

15%

91.3 (22 – 323, n=137)

23%

Pros

+ sturdy chassis

+ improved performance utilization

+ excellent input devices

+ good upgrade option

+ very good port selection

Cons

short battery runtime due to lack of iGPU

4K display with shortcomings

CPU/GPU performance limited on battery

high price

In review: Lenovo ThinkPad P73. Test model courtesy of Lenovo Germany.
In review: Lenovo ThinkPad P73. Test model courtesy of Lenovo Germany.

The performance utilization was the biggest drawback in our initial review of the ThinkPad P73. It took a couple of months and a number of BIOS updates, but the performance of the dedicated Quadro graphics card is now on the expected level. 

The new ThinkPad P17 does not offer any noticeable improvements in terms of raw component power, so the performance of the P73 is actually still competitive. The Core i9 processor benefits from the high TDP limits and offers stable performance, just like the Quadro RTX 4000 from Nvidia. No problems here.

Lenovo managed to improve the performance utilization of the components thanks to several BIOS updates. Equipped with the Core i9 (9th generation) and the Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000, the ThinkPad P73 is still a very competitive mobile workstation.

We are not completely convinced by the 4K panel. The subjective picture quality is good in general, but our review unit suffered from visible backlight bleeding and the factory calibration is not great, either. The brightness is also lower than advertised. Lenovo wants to address the latter with the successor ThinkPad P17, but we obviously still have to test that.

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR0030GE – 01/20/2021 v7

Andreas Osthoff

Connectivity

72 / 80 → 90%

Application Performance

90%

Workstation – Weighted Average

Andreas Osthoff, 2021-01-23 (Update: 2021-01-23)

Andreas Osthoff

I grew up with computers and modern consumer electronics. I am interested in the technology since I had my first computer, a Commodore C64, and started building my own PCs after that. My focus here at Notebookcheck is the business segment including mobile workstations, but I also like to test new mobile devices. It is always a great experience to review and compare new products. My free time is filled with a lot of sports, in the summer mainly on my bike.

Read More

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here